[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [escepticos] Re: Hombre de Flores

To: <escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [escepticos] Re: Hombre de Flores
From: <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:04:07 +0200
Delivered-to: escepticos-outgoing@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <28c165af3c36.446db3f1@xxxxxx> <446D9E18.50004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <007d01c67b2f$5d694fe0$5d01a8c0@revillapc> <446DA47C.4040503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx

1000 gracias, a ver si con mi microcéfalo consigo enterarme de algo :)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cibernesto" <cibernesto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 12:57 PM
Subject: [escepticos] Re: Hombre de Flores


david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> No habrá algún link al que echarle el ojillo?


El paper de Science:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/312/5776/999b

Artículo de New Scientist, con declaraciones contrarias:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9190-new-research-suggests-hobbit-was-not-a-new-species.html

References:
- [escepticos] Hombre de Flores
  - From: Juan Antonio Rodríguez García
- [escepticos] Re: Hombre de Flores
  - From: Cibernesto
- Re: [escepticos] Re: Hombre de Flores
  - From: david
- [escepticos] Re: Hombre de Flores
  - From: Cibernesto

Prev by Date: [escepticos] Re: Hombre de Flores
Next by Date: Re: [escepticos] Hombre de Flores
Previous by thread: [escepticos] Re: Hombre de Flores
Next by thread: Re: [escepticos] Hombre de Flores
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread