[escepticos] R.Dawkins y el dios perezoso: contestando a Napoleon

["Fernando Peregrin" <amscofin@...>]

Napoleón Moreno dijo:
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ya dije lo que pienso de la metodologia materialista y lo repito ahora.

Es un principio "Metodologico" no un criterio de verdad. dice que la
ciencia
debe buscar las "Causas" (uso la palabra para no salirme del contexto 
historico donde surgio) dentro del universo. No es una razon es un metodo.

Si se dice que dios no intervino mas en la creacion, porque la hizo
perfecta.
No hay conflicto con la metodologia de la ciencia. Es un poco como la
distincion
entre "materialismo metodologico" y  "materialismo metafisico"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Richard Dawkins contesta:

There is a temptation to argue that, although God may not be needed to
explain the evolution of complex order once the universe, with its
fundamental laws of physics, had begun, we do need a God to explain the
origin of all things. This idea doesn't leave God with very much to do:
just set off the big bang, then sit back and wait for everything to happen.
The physical chemist Peter Atkins, in his beautifully written book The
Creation, postulates a lazy God who strove to do as little as possible in
order to initiate everything. Atkins explains how each step in the history
of the universe followed, by simple physical law, from its predecessor. He
thus pares down the amount of work that the lazy creator would need to do
and eventually concludes that he would in fact have needed to do nothing at
all! 

----------
Por la edición,

FerPer