[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [escepticos] [skeptics en bdsn.com.au: How many homoeopaths ... ?]
To
:
escepticos en dis.ulpgc.es
Subject
: Re: [escepticos] [skeptics en bdsn.com.au: How many homoeopaths ... ?]
From
: Borja Marcos <
borjamar@...
>
Date
: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:19:00 +0200
Delivered-to
: escepticos-outgoing en dis.ulpgc.es
Delivered-to
: escepticos en dis.ulpgc.es
In-reply-to
: <
72ECA748-C25B-11D8-BD38-000393C94468 en sarenet.es
>
References
: <
20040619111731.GI21199 en chema.homelinux.org
> <
72ECA748-C25B-11D8-BD38-000393C94468 en sarenet.es
>
Reply-to
:
escepticos en dis.ulpgc.es
Sender
:
owner-escepticos en dis.ulpgc.es
R: 6,02 * 10^-23
Lapsus horario... por favor, quiten ese "menos" del exponente del 10 :-)
Borja.
References
:
[escepticos] [skeptics en bdsn.com.au: How many homoeopaths ... ?]
From: José María Mateos <josemaria.mateos@...>
Re: [escepticos] [skeptics en bdsn.com.au: How many homoeopaths ... ?]
From: Borja Marcos <borjamar@...>
Prev by Date:
[escepticos] Re: Darwin y la top model
Next by Date:
[escepticos] Re: [escepticos] Crítica a 'El código Da Vinci'
Previous by thread:
Re: [escepticos] [skeptics en bdsn.com.au: How many homoeopaths ... ?]
Next by thread:
[escepticos] Fwd: ¿Por qué todavía se fomenta la superstición?
Index(es):
Date
Thread