[escepticos] Re: [escepticos] Re: [escepticos] Fraudes en estudios y sesgo en su publicación.]

[Ramón Ordiales <ramon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Si tienen algun enlace interesante, se lo agradecere.
>
> --Tei

Busca  a este autor:

McCutchen, C.W. (1997). Peer review: Treacherous servant, disastrous master. 
Technology Review, 94(7), 28-36, 40.
y  en la misma revista números 38-39,1991 pp 50-56

---

Otros:

Blum, D. E. "Younger Scientist feel big pressure in battle for grants" en 
Chronicle of Higher education, 26 1990 pp 16-17

Chubin D.E. et al. Peerless Science. Peer review ans the US science policy, 
Albani-Newyork 1990

Colin M. "Reduce fraud in seven easy steps" science 224, 1984 p581

Roy R. "Alternatives to review by peers" en minerva, 22, 1984 pp 316-28

Smith R.J. "Problem with peer review and alternatives" en British Medicl 
Journal, 296, 1988 pp 774-77