[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[escepticos] RE criticar a ARP-SAPc?

To: escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [escepticos] RE criticar a ARP-SAPc?
From: Cibernesto <cibernesto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:07:53 +0200
Delivered-to: escepticos-outgoing@dis.ulpgc.es
Delivered-to: escepticos@dis.ulpgc.es
In-reply-to: <42BFF66D.6020605@gobiernodecanarias.org>
References: <20050627105148.9163C18675@smtp-01.servidoresdns.net> <"008701c57 b 07$64321b00$2201a8c0"@TRAVELMATE> <42BFEA0F.5000700@gobiernodecanarias.org> <015501c57b11$055a9490$05001aac@Ambroxius> <42BFF66D.6020605@gobiernodecanarias.org>
Reply-to: escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707)

[Pedro J Hernández González]

Así, que a través de todas las culturas podemos reconocer ciertos universales que por definición tendrían que ser biológicos en origen

[Ernesto] No se sigue. Pueden tener simplemente un origen cultural común, o un origen cultural independiente. "Universal" no significa "biológico", y mucho menos "por definición".

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [escepticos] RE criticar a ARP-SAPc?
  - From: Pedro J HernÃndez GonzÃlez

References:
- RE: [escepticos] RE criticar a ARP-SAPc?
  - From: Fernando Cardador
- Re: [escepticos] RE criticar a ARP-SAPc?
  - From: Pedro J HernÃndez GonzÃlez
- [escepticos] RE criticar a ARP-SAPc?
  - From: Jose Ramón Brox
- Re: [escepticos] RE criticar a ARP-SAPc?
  - From: Pedro J HernÃndez GonzÃlez

Prev by Date: [escepticos] RE El bien (era criticar a ARP-SAPc?)
Next by Date: Re: [escepticos] RE criticar a ARP-SAPc?
Previous by thread: RE: [escepticos] prismaticos
Next by thread: Re: [escepticos] RE criticar a ARP-SAPc?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread