[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [escepticos] Re[2]: [escepticos] Re: [escep ticos] Re: [escepticos] ?

To: Yamato <escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re[2]: [escepticos] Re[2]: [escepticos] Re: [escep ticos] Re: [escepticos] ?
From: jmbello <jmbello@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:31:17 +0100
Delivered-to: escepticos-outgoing@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <43E15EDD.6030209@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <BAY103-F29954EBEB020E306BB4A90C6160@xxxxxxx> <76b55fb0602011153j34db861dk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200602012156.29505.hgpozos@xxxxxxxx> <200602020007.25843.txeyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43E15EDD.6030209@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-escepticos@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Hello Yamato,

Thursday, February 2, 2006, 2:22:37 AM, you wrote:

Y> Eso opinamos muchos, incluyendo el amigo jurista de Heriberto o yo 
Y> mismo. Supongo que el Constitucional no tardará en confirmárnoslo.

Hablando del Constitucional, ¿se presentó al final algún recurso de
inconstitucionalidad contra la ley catalana de lo audiovisual que
tanto debatimos por aquí?

Saludos

JM

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [escepticos] Re[2]: [escepticos] Re: [escep ticos] Re: [escepticos] ?
  - From: Yamato

References:
- Re: [escepticos] Re[2]: [escepticos] Re: [escep ticos] Re: [escepticos] ï¿œ
  - From: Akin
- Re: [escepticos] Re[2]: [escepticos] Re: [escep ticos] Re: [escepticos] ï¿œ
  - From: Heriberto G. Pozos
- Re: [escepticos] Re[2]: [escepticos] Re: [escep ticos] Re: [escepticos] ï¿œ
  - From: Txeyen
- Re: [escepticos] Re[2]: [escepticos] Re: [escep ticos] Re: [escepticos] ?
  - From: Yamato

Prev by Date: Re: [escepticos] RE ? (Marx)
Next by Date: [escepticos] RE ? (Marx)
Previous by thread: Re: [escepticos] Re[2]: [escepticos] Re: [escep ticos] Re: [escepticos] ?
Next by thread: Re: [escepticos] Re[2]: [escepticos] Re: [escep ticos] Re: [escepticos] ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread